馃敀 Business vs. Technology. Does AI help us speak the same language?
Engineers talk about models and data, while business folks discuss risk, costs and outcomes. Does AI help bridge communication gaps in organizations? What skills are essential today to develop AI-based solutions?
Are business and technology still speaking different languages? Has AI development changed anything in this regard? Or has it just become another “technology to implement”, only creating new fields of misunderstanding?
Share
You might be interested in
-
馃敀 How far are we from AGI? It depends on who鈥檚 measuring
AGI has long been the goal of the world鈥檚 biggest AI labs. The problem is that OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic and Chinese players don鈥檛 always mean the same thing when they talk…
-
馃敀 First they deploy AI. Then they ask if it’s legal.
Many organizations can’t tell whether their use of AI involves processing personal data, or whether they’re prepared for it. The problem starts when questions about legal compliance come up only after a…
-
馃敀 The invisible trace: debate over AI text watermarks
Anthropic wants to leave an invisible, machine-detectable trace in texts generated by Claude. Is that a step toward greater transparency or an unfair generalization?
-
馃敀 The end of reading tea leaves? AI regulations (will be) based on facts
For years, the AI debate has been driven by big promises and equally big warnings that often couldn’t be confirmed. The UN is now trying to build a scientific evidence base that…
